WEDNESDAY (16-DEC-20)

Pair 11 EW - ANN SPIGHT / IAN SPIGHT
Place: 2, Percentage: 58.8%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	6: JUDY PARKINSON / PAULINE GRAY	1 E	9C	6	-50	10	62%
Board 2	6: JUDY PARKINSON / PAULINE GRAY	3 N	9H	9	-140	5	31%
Board 3	6: JUDY PARKINSON / PAULINE GRAY	4 W	7S	10	620	15	94%
Board 4	1: AMBER NOONAN / JUDY PAYNE	5 S	4D	12	-620	10	62%
Board 5	1: AMBER NOONAN / JUDY PAYNE	2NT N	4S	11	-210	12	75%
Board 6	1: AMBER NOONAN / JUDY PAYNE	2 S	QC	10	-170	2	12%
Board 7	7: PENELOPE PARKER / DEBI WEBBER	3NT N	7D	10	-630	16	100%
Board 8	7: PENELOPE PARKER / DEBI WEBBER	4 W	QC	11	450	12	75%
Board 9	7: PENELOPE PARKER / DEBI WEBBER	1 W	KD	7	80	4	25%
Board 10	2: ** Unknown Number / JENNY SYKES	6 N	9H	13	-1390	5	31%
Board 11	2: ** Unknown Number / JENNY SYKES	3 N	AC	10	-170	16	100%
Board 12	2: ** Unknown Number / JENNY SYKES	5 N	QS	8	300	16	100%
Board 13	8: ROBIN VICARY / LEE PRESTON	4 E	8C	11	650	13	81%
Board 14	8: ROBIN VICARY / LEE PRESTON	6 S	AH	12	-920	0	0%
Board 15	8: ROBIN VICARY / LEE PRESTON	2 S	2C	7	100	11	69%
Board 16	3: JACQUELINE WILLIAMS / SYLVIA YOUNG	4 W	KS	10	130	10	62%
Board 17	3: JACQUELINE WILLIAMS / SYLVIA YOUNG	4 E	9C	11	450	14	88%
Board 18	3: JACQUELINE WILLIAMS / SYLVIA YOUNG	4 W	KD	9	-50	4	25%
Board 22	4: TIMOTHY NASH / ELIZABETH NASH	4 S	9H	8	100	14	88%
Board 23	4: TIMOTHY NASH / ELIZABETH NASH	2 W	AD	11	200	11	69%
Board 24	4: TIMOTHY NASH / ELIZABETH NASH	4 S	5D	10	-420	3	19%
Board 28	5: NEIL VAN OOSTEROM / JOHN DE RIDDER	3 S	KH	9	-140	8	50%
Board 29	5: NEIL VAN OOSTEROM / JOHN DE RIDDER	4 W	5C	8	-200	8	50%
Board 30	5: NEIL VAN OOSTEROM / JOHN DE RIDDER	6NT S	3D	12	-990	4	25%
Board 31	11: BRUCE BAGULEY / KAY BAGULEY	3NT S	9D	9	-600	1	6%
Board 32	11: BRUCE BAGULEY / KAY BAGULEY	3NT E	7S	9	600	16	100%
Board 33	11: BRUCE BAGULEY / KAY BAGULEY	3NT N	KS	7	100	14	88%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results