MONDAY 2312

Pair 9 EW - JOHN MCILRATH / PATRICIA MCILRATH
Place: 2, Percentage: 58.74%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	5: CHRISTINE BLACKLEDGE / PATRICIA PEPPER	4 N	AC	10	-420	13	81%
Board 2	5: CHRISTINE BLACKLEDGE / PATRICIA PEPPER	4X N	2S	10	-790	0	0%
Board 3	5: CHRISTINE BLACKLEDGE / PATRICIA PEPPER	2 S	9H	8	-110	6	38%
Board 4	1: HELEN JONES / ROSALIE DERRICK	4 N	AD	12	-680	6	38%
Board 5	1: HELEN JONES / ROSALIE DERRICK	4 E	7D	9	-50	12	75%
Board 6	1: HELEN JONES / ROSALIE DERRICK	5 E	AC	10	-100	10	62%
Board 7	6: MADELEINE MANN / DOROTHY WOOD	3 W	8H	9	110	10	62%
Board 8	6: MADELEINE MANN / DOROTHY WOOD	3 N	6H	9	-110	14	88%
Board 9	6: MADELEINE MANN / DOROTHY WOOD	1NT N	7D	9	-150	6	38%
Board 10	2: THOMAS FEHILY / TONY CONNELLY	1NT N	AS	8	-120	7	44%
Board 11	2: THOMAS FEHILY / TONY CONNELLY	5 E	AH	10	-50	2	12%
Board 12	2: THOMAS FEHILY / TONY CONNELLY	3 W	5S	11	150	10	62%
Board 13	7: DOT SAXON-WILLIAMS / JUDY PARKINSON	3NT N	QS	10	-630	13	81%
Board 14	7: DOT SAXON-WILLIAMS / JUDY PARKINSON	3NT E	7H	9	400	10	62%
Board 15	7: DOT SAXON-WILLIAMS / JUDY PARKINSON	1NT N	2S	8	-120	14	88%
Board 16	3: KERRY WRIGHT / LEE PRESTON	2NT E	2S	8	120	2	12%
Board 17	3: KERRY WRIGHT / LEE PRESTON	4 N	6H	12	-480	3	19%
Board 18	3: KERRY WRIGHT / LEE PRESTON	4 E	KH	11	450	13	81%
Board 19	8: TIMOTHY NASH / ELIZABETH NASH	2 N	AC	9	-140	6	38%
Board 20	8: TIMOTHY NASH / ELIZABETH NASH	3 E	7D	8	-100	16	100%
Board 21	8: TIMOTHY NASH / ELIZABETH NASH	3NT E	6C	9	400	14	88%
Board 22	4: JACQUELINE WILLIAMS / STEVEN SWAN	4X S	9D	5	1100	16	100%
Board 23	4: JACQUELINE WILLIAMS / STEVEN SWAN	4 W	KD	11	650	10	62%
Board 24	4: JACQUELINE WILLIAMS / STEVEN SWAN	3 S	AH	8	50	13	81%
Board 25	9: PETER BENDELSTEIN / MARK MOSKOW	4 N	AD	9	50	13	81%
Board 26	9: PETER BENDELSTEIN / MARK MOSKOW	3 N	KS	5	400	14.8	92%
Board 27	9: PETER BENDELSTEIN / MARK MOSKOW	4 N	AD	10	-420	0	0%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results